The best of village head performance

Simple additive weighting method

P. Ambika, B. Ayshwarya, Phong Thanh Nguyen, Wahidah Hashim, Fatma Rinjani, Muhamad Muslihudin, K. Shankar, Oksana P. Denisova, Andino Maseleno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The village head is the leader of the village level government. Achieving the development of a village demands the role of a qualified village head. His role, duties, and responsibilities are crucial to the progress of the village. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is one of the methods in decision support system where alternative and criteria have been determined. Criteria that have been determined include: gender, how long served, how the facilities and infrastructure, achievement of the program, and the welfare of the community. Based on the results of research that has been done in Pagelaran Subdistrict of ten alternatives in the trial then there is a ranking order ranking as follows A3 with the largest value 1; A1 = 0,9; A5 = 0,85; A10 = 0,83; A2 = 0,83; A6 = 0,78; A7 = 0,68; A4 = 0,58; A9 = 0,51, and A8 has a value of 0.31 which is the lowest value of the alternatives already in trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1568-1572
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering
Volume8
Issue number2 Special Issue 3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Decision support systems
Weighting
Ranking

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Ambika, P., Ayshwarya, B., Nguyen, P. T., Hashim, W., Rinjani, F., Muslihudin, M., ... Maseleno, A. (2019). The best of village head performance: Simple additive weighting method. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 3), 1568-1572. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1286.0782S319
Ambika, P. ; Ayshwarya, B. ; Nguyen, Phong Thanh ; Hashim, Wahidah ; Rinjani, Fatma ; Muslihudin, Muhamad ; Shankar, K. ; Denisova, Oksana P. ; Maseleno, Andino. / The best of village head performance : Simple additive weighting method. In: International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. 2019 ; Vol. 8, No. 2 Special Issue 3. pp. 1568-1572.
@article{cb55efd50d504a4b8b722333ba2ae476,
title = "The best of village head performance: Simple additive weighting method",
abstract = "The village head is the leader of the village level government. Achieving the development of a village demands the role of a qualified village head. His role, duties, and responsibilities are crucial to the progress of the village. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is one of the methods in decision support system where alternative and criteria have been determined. Criteria that have been determined include: gender, how long served, how the facilities and infrastructure, achievement of the program, and the welfare of the community. Based on the results of research that has been done in Pagelaran Subdistrict of ten alternatives in the trial then there is a ranking order ranking as follows A3 with the largest value 1; A1 = 0,9; A5 = 0,85; A10 = 0,83; A2 = 0,83; A6 = 0,78; A7 = 0,68; A4 = 0,58; A9 = 0,51, and A8 has a value of 0.31 which is the lowest value of the alternatives already in trial.",
author = "P. Ambika and B. Ayshwarya and Nguyen, {Phong Thanh} and Wahidah Hashim and Fatma Rinjani and Muhamad Muslihudin and K. Shankar and Denisova, {Oksana P.} and Andino Maseleno",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.35940/ijrte.B1286.0782S319",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1568--1572",
journal = "International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering",
issn = "2277-3878",
publisher = "Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication",
number = "2 Special Issue 3",

}

Ambika, P, Ayshwarya, B, Nguyen, PT, Hashim, W, Rinjani, F, Muslihudin, M, Shankar, K, Denisova, OP & Maseleno, A 2019, 'The best of village head performance: Simple additive weighting method', International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2 Special Issue 3, pp. 1568-1572. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1286.0782S319

The best of village head performance : Simple additive weighting method. / Ambika, P.; Ayshwarya, B.; Nguyen, Phong Thanh; Hashim, Wahidah; Rinjani, Fatma; Muslihudin, Muhamad; Shankar, K.; Denisova, Oksana P.; Maseleno, Andino.

In: International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2 Special Issue 3, 01.07.2019, p. 1568-1572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The best of village head performance

T2 - Simple additive weighting method

AU - Ambika, P.

AU - Ayshwarya, B.

AU - Nguyen, Phong Thanh

AU - Hashim, Wahidah

AU - Rinjani, Fatma

AU - Muslihudin, Muhamad

AU - Shankar, K.

AU - Denisova, Oksana P.

AU - Maseleno, Andino

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - The village head is the leader of the village level government. Achieving the development of a village demands the role of a qualified village head. His role, duties, and responsibilities are crucial to the progress of the village. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is one of the methods in decision support system where alternative and criteria have been determined. Criteria that have been determined include: gender, how long served, how the facilities and infrastructure, achievement of the program, and the welfare of the community. Based on the results of research that has been done in Pagelaran Subdistrict of ten alternatives in the trial then there is a ranking order ranking as follows A3 with the largest value 1; A1 = 0,9; A5 = 0,85; A10 = 0,83; A2 = 0,83; A6 = 0,78; A7 = 0,68; A4 = 0,58; A9 = 0,51, and A8 has a value of 0.31 which is the lowest value of the alternatives already in trial.

AB - The village head is the leader of the village level government. Achieving the development of a village demands the role of a qualified village head. His role, duties, and responsibilities are crucial to the progress of the village. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is one of the methods in decision support system where alternative and criteria have been determined. Criteria that have been determined include: gender, how long served, how the facilities and infrastructure, achievement of the program, and the welfare of the community. Based on the results of research that has been done in Pagelaran Subdistrict of ten alternatives in the trial then there is a ranking order ranking as follows A3 with the largest value 1; A1 = 0,9; A5 = 0,85; A10 = 0,83; A2 = 0,83; A6 = 0,78; A7 = 0,68; A4 = 0,58; A9 = 0,51, and A8 has a value of 0.31 which is the lowest value of the alternatives already in trial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070691157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070691157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.35940/ijrte.B1286.0782S319

DO - 10.35940/ijrte.B1286.0782S319

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1568

EP - 1572

JO - International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering

JF - International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering

SN - 2277-3878

IS - 2 Special Issue 3

ER -