Performance of bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash

Sivakumar Naganathan, Almamon Yousef Omer Mohamed, Kamal Nasharuddin Mustapha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of investigation carried out on bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash using a non-conventional method. Bricks were cast using self-compacting mixtures of bottom ash, fly ash and cement eliminating both pressing and firing. Bricks were then tested for compressive strength, modulus of rupture, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption, initial rate of suction, fire resistance and durability. The results showed better performance compared to conventional clay bricks in the properties investigated. Compressive strength was between 7.13 and 17.36 MPa, while UPV ranged from 2.2 to 2.96 km/s. Increase in fly ash reduced the water absorption. Tests for fire resistance indicated that the bricks did not show any spalling, and, there was increase in strength of up to 30% after heating. The optimum ratio of bottom ash, fly ash and cement was found to be 1:1:0.45 for better performance of bricks. It is concluded that bricks developed in this study can be used as an alternative to conventional bricks and hence can contribute to sustainable development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)576-580
Number of pages5
JournalConstruction and Building Materials
Volume96
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

Ashes
Coal Ash
Brick
Fly ash
Fire resistance
Water absorption
Compressive strength
Cements
Ultrasonics
Spalling
Sustainable development
Clay

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

@article{278021458c034714a6948d769cec81b0,
title = "Performance of bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash",
abstract = "This paper presents the findings of investigation carried out on bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash using a non-conventional method. Bricks were cast using self-compacting mixtures of bottom ash, fly ash and cement eliminating both pressing and firing. Bricks were then tested for compressive strength, modulus of rupture, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption, initial rate of suction, fire resistance and durability. The results showed better performance compared to conventional clay bricks in the properties investigated. Compressive strength was between 7.13 and 17.36 MPa, while UPV ranged from 2.2 to 2.96 km/s. Increase in fly ash reduced the water absorption. Tests for fire resistance indicated that the bricks did not show any spalling, and, there was increase in strength of up to 30{\%} after heating. The optimum ratio of bottom ash, fly ash and cement was found to be 1:1:0.45 for better performance of bricks. It is concluded that bricks developed in this study can be used as an alternative to conventional bricks and hence can contribute to sustainable development.",
author = "Sivakumar Naganathan and Mohamed, {Almamon Yousef Omer} and Mustapha, {Kamal Nasharuddin}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.068",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "576--580",
journal = "Construction and Building Materials",
issn = "0950-0618",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Performance of bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash. / Naganathan, Sivakumar; Mohamed, Almamon Yousef Omer; Mustapha, Kamal Nasharuddin.

In: Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 96, 24.08.2015, p. 576-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash

AU - Naganathan, Sivakumar

AU - Mohamed, Almamon Yousef Omer

AU - Mustapha, Kamal Nasharuddin

PY - 2015/8/24

Y1 - 2015/8/24

N2 - This paper presents the findings of investigation carried out on bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash using a non-conventional method. Bricks were cast using self-compacting mixtures of bottom ash, fly ash and cement eliminating both pressing and firing. Bricks were then tested for compressive strength, modulus of rupture, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption, initial rate of suction, fire resistance and durability. The results showed better performance compared to conventional clay bricks in the properties investigated. Compressive strength was between 7.13 and 17.36 MPa, while UPV ranged from 2.2 to 2.96 km/s. Increase in fly ash reduced the water absorption. Tests for fire resistance indicated that the bricks did not show any spalling, and, there was increase in strength of up to 30% after heating. The optimum ratio of bottom ash, fly ash and cement was found to be 1:1:0.45 for better performance of bricks. It is concluded that bricks developed in this study can be used as an alternative to conventional bricks and hence can contribute to sustainable development.

AB - This paper presents the findings of investigation carried out on bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash using a non-conventional method. Bricks were cast using self-compacting mixtures of bottom ash, fly ash and cement eliminating both pressing and firing. Bricks were then tested for compressive strength, modulus of rupture, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption, initial rate of suction, fire resistance and durability. The results showed better performance compared to conventional clay bricks in the properties investigated. Compressive strength was between 7.13 and 17.36 MPa, while UPV ranged from 2.2 to 2.96 km/s. Increase in fly ash reduced the water absorption. Tests for fire resistance indicated that the bricks did not show any spalling, and, there was increase in strength of up to 30% after heating. The optimum ratio of bottom ash, fly ash and cement was found to be 1:1:0.45 for better performance of bricks. It is concluded that bricks developed in this study can be used as an alternative to conventional bricks and hence can contribute to sustainable development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939801935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939801935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.068

DO - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.068

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 576

EP - 580

JO - Construction and Building Materials

JF - Construction and Building Materials

SN - 0950-0618

ER -