Evaluation study outcome of augmented reality technology for solving engineering problems in UNITEN: Augmented reality technology for solving engineering problems in UNITEN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, a study was done to compare the preferences of UNITEN students in using augmented reality technology user interface applications to solve selected engineering problems. Cross sectional study design and a Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test approach was adopted to analyze the difference in the rankings of the engineering applications. Within a controlled environment, this research further applies “Trials within the same session but with breaks between tasks” an affirmed reliable method in measuring learnability that has been rarely explored by any related works locally. The results were captured through descriptive statistical analysis. The findings provided reliable evidences that multiple function user interface (MFIT) is more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. Simultaneously, this research also presents evidences that MFIT is better than TUI in the engineering problem solving statistically.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-84
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Augmented reality
user interface
User interfaces
engineering
evaluation
Students
cross-sectional study
statistical analysis
evidence
ranking
Statistical methods
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

@article{67f3326ae4e54c94a92467d696e7d89f,
title = "Evaluation study outcome of augmented reality technology for solving engineering problems in UNITEN: Augmented reality technology for solving engineering problems in UNITEN",
abstract = "In this article, a study was done to compare the preferences of UNITEN students in using augmented reality technology user interface applications to solve selected engineering problems. Cross sectional study design and a Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test approach was adopted to analyze the difference in the rankings of the engineering applications. Within a controlled environment, this research further applies “Trials within the same session but with breaks between tasks” an affirmed reliable method in measuring learnability that has been rarely explored by any related works locally. The results were captured through descriptive statistical analysis. The findings provided reliable evidences that multiple function user interface (MFIT) is more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. Simultaneously, this research also presents evidences that MFIT is better than TUI in the engineering problem solving statistically.",
author = "{Basant Singh}, {Manjit Sigh}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4018/IJICTE.2019040105",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "69--84",
journal = "International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education",
issn = "1550-1876",
publisher = "IGI Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation study outcome of augmented reality technology for solving engineering problems in UNITEN

T2 - Augmented reality technology for solving engineering problems in UNITEN

AU - Basant Singh, Manjit Sigh

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - In this article, a study was done to compare the preferences of UNITEN students in using augmented reality technology user interface applications to solve selected engineering problems. Cross sectional study design and a Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test approach was adopted to analyze the difference in the rankings of the engineering applications. Within a controlled environment, this research further applies “Trials within the same session but with breaks between tasks” an affirmed reliable method in measuring learnability that has been rarely explored by any related works locally. The results were captured through descriptive statistical analysis. The findings provided reliable evidences that multiple function user interface (MFIT) is more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. Simultaneously, this research also presents evidences that MFIT is better than TUI in the engineering problem solving statistically.

AB - In this article, a study was done to compare the preferences of UNITEN students in using augmented reality technology user interface applications to solve selected engineering problems. Cross sectional study design and a Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test approach was adopted to analyze the difference in the rankings of the engineering applications. Within a controlled environment, this research further applies “Trials within the same session but with breaks between tasks” an affirmed reliable method in measuring learnability that has been rarely explored by any related works locally. The results were captured through descriptive statistical analysis. The findings provided reliable evidences that multiple function user interface (MFIT) is more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. Simultaneously, this research also presents evidences that MFIT is better than TUI in the engineering problem solving statistically.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062167344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062167344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4018/IJICTE.2019040105

DO - 10.4018/IJICTE.2019040105

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062167344

VL - 15

SP - 69

EP - 84

JO - International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education

JF - International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education

SN - 1550-1876

IS - 2

ER -