Evaluation Of Difference Mesh Size For Overland Routing Model

Lariyah Mohd Sidek, Wan Hazdy Azad, Hidayah Basri, Suhani Saidin, Abd Jalil Hassan

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Two dimensional flow modelling are widely used for flood plain analysis and are considered to be a viable tool for evaluating flood propagation. The accuracy of open channel hydraulic and flood plain model is dependent on the refinement of model mesh or grid in representing ground model topography using high resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). This paper investigates the sensitivity of unstructured mesh size of two dimensional (2D) shallow water models. The accuracy of presenting overland flood propagation was carried out using Delaunay refinement method. The study was performed by connecting to the 2D hydrodynamic modelling platform InfoWorks Integrated Catchment Modelling (ICM) using two different methodologies. The first method is based on the generation Baseline of mesh model from the digital terrain model (DTM), whereas the second method is based on the coarser of base mesh. The results of flood propagation were analysed using distinctive mesh resolutions as a part of term of surge degree and run time. The flood overland flow results as provided by the mesh techniques demonstrated all the changes when contrasted to their identical standard situations. However, further study is necessary to understand the entire performance of the two suggested methods.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-9
Number of pages9
Publication statusSubmitted - 14 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

mesh size
routing
channel hydraulics
two-dimensional modeling
two-dimensional flow
flow modeling
digital terrain model
overland flow
modeling
evaluation
shallow water
hydrodynamics
topography
catchment
methodology
method

Cite this

Mohd Sidek, Lariyah ; Azad, Wan Hazdy ; Basri, Hidayah ; Saidin, Suhani ; Hassan, Abd Jalil. / Evaluation Of Difference Mesh Size For Overland Routing Model. 9 p.
@conference{4d76592b128f4a6090f7269a3db267ad,
title = "Evaluation Of Difference Mesh Size For Overland Routing Model",
abstract = "Two dimensional flow modelling are widely used for flood plain analysis and are considered to be a viable tool for evaluating flood propagation. The accuracy of open channel hydraulic and flood plain model is dependent on the refinement of model mesh or grid in representing ground model topography using high resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). This paper investigates the sensitivity of unstructured mesh size of two dimensional (2D) shallow water models. The accuracy of presenting overland flood propagation was carried out using Delaunay refinement method. The study was performed by connecting to the 2D hydrodynamic modelling platform InfoWorks Integrated Catchment Modelling (ICM) using two different methodologies. The first method is based on the generation Baseline of mesh model from the digital terrain model (DTM), whereas the second method is based on the coarser of base mesh. The results of flood propagation were analysed using distinctive mesh resolutions as a part of term of surge degree and run time. The flood overland flow results as provided by the mesh techniques demonstrated all the changes when contrasted to their identical standard situations. However, further study is necessary to understand the entire performance of the two suggested methods.",
author = "{Mohd Sidek}, Lariyah and Azad, {Wan Hazdy} and Hidayah Basri and Suhani Saidin and Hassan, {Abd Jalil}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "14",
language = "English",
pages = "1--9",

}

Evaluation Of Difference Mesh Size For Overland Routing Model. / Mohd Sidek, Lariyah; Azad, Wan Hazdy; Basri, Hidayah; Saidin, Suhani; Hassan, Abd Jalil.

2017. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Evaluation Of Difference Mesh Size For Overland Routing Model

AU - Mohd Sidek, Lariyah

AU - Azad, Wan Hazdy

AU - Basri, Hidayah

AU - Saidin, Suhani

AU - Hassan, Abd Jalil

PY - 2017/8/14

Y1 - 2017/8/14

N2 - Two dimensional flow modelling are widely used for flood plain analysis and are considered to be a viable tool for evaluating flood propagation. The accuracy of open channel hydraulic and flood plain model is dependent on the refinement of model mesh or grid in representing ground model topography using high resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). This paper investigates the sensitivity of unstructured mesh size of two dimensional (2D) shallow water models. The accuracy of presenting overland flood propagation was carried out using Delaunay refinement method. The study was performed by connecting to the 2D hydrodynamic modelling platform InfoWorks Integrated Catchment Modelling (ICM) using two different methodologies. The first method is based on the generation Baseline of mesh model from the digital terrain model (DTM), whereas the second method is based on the coarser of base mesh. The results of flood propagation were analysed using distinctive mesh resolutions as a part of term of surge degree and run time. The flood overland flow results as provided by the mesh techniques demonstrated all the changes when contrasted to their identical standard situations. However, further study is necessary to understand the entire performance of the two suggested methods.

AB - Two dimensional flow modelling are widely used for flood plain analysis and are considered to be a viable tool for evaluating flood propagation. The accuracy of open channel hydraulic and flood plain model is dependent on the refinement of model mesh or grid in representing ground model topography using high resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). This paper investigates the sensitivity of unstructured mesh size of two dimensional (2D) shallow water models. The accuracy of presenting overland flood propagation was carried out using Delaunay refinement method. The study was performed by connecting to the 2D hydrodynamic modelling platform InfoWorks Integrated Catchment Modelling (ICM) using two different methodologies. The first method is based on the generation Baseline of mesh model from the digital terrain model (DTM), whereas the second method is based on the coarser of base mesh. The results of flood propagation were analysed using distinctive mesh resolutions as a part of term of surge degree and run time. The flood overland flow results as provided by the mesh techniques demonstrated all the changes when contrasted to their identical standard situations. However, further study is necessary to understand the entire performance of the two suggested methods.

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 9

ER -