Engineering students learning preferences in UNITEN

Comparative study and patterns of learning styles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Engineering educators have been increasingly taking the learning style theories into serious consideration as part of their efforts to enhance the teaching and learning in engineering. This paper presents a research study to investigate the learning style preference of the mechanical engineering students in Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia by means of the Personality and Learning Styles instruments. Descriptive statistical method was used to analyze the collected samples (n = 122). The findings of this study revealed that the preference style for engineering students are more towards spontaneous, pragmatic and concrete style of learning. This is consistent with the previous research findings on the learning preference for engineering students in UNITEN using Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) and Felder and Silverman Index of Learning Style (ILS) instruments. Therefore, it is important for the engineering educators to be aware of the students learning preferences by adjusting the teaching and learning strategies to unleash the learning potential of the students. Multi-approaches in teaching and learning are recommended to accommodate different students learning preferences while widening the students learning capabilities in engineering education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-281
Number of pages16
JournalEducational Technology and Society
Volume18
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Students
engineering
learning
student
Teaching
Engineering education
Mechanical engineering
Statistical methods
educator
Concretes
mechanical engineering
teaching strategy
statistical method
learning strategy
Malaysia
pragmatics
personality
questionnaire

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{99b6a1d949af43458227f02a9a32c024,
title = "Engineering students learning preferences in UNITEN: Comparative study and patterns of learning styles",
abstract = "Engineering educators have been increasingly taking the learning style theories into serious consideration as part of their efforts to enhance the teaching and learning in engineering. This paper presents a research study to investigate the learning style preference of the mechanical engineering students in Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia by means of the Personality and Learning Styles instruments. Descriptive statistical method was used to analyze the collected samples (n = 122). The findings of this study revealed that the preference style for engineering students are more towards spontaneous, pragmatic and concrete style of learning. This is consistent with the previous research findings on the learning preference for engineering students in UNITEN using Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) and Felder and Silverman Index of Learning Style (ILS) instruments. Therefore, it is important for the engineering educators to be aware of the students learning preferences by adjusting the teaching and learning strategies to unleash the learning potential of the students. Multi-approaches in teaching and learning are recommended to accommodate different students learning preferences while widening the students learning capabilities in engineering education.",
author = "Lee, {Chen Kang} and {Basant Singh}, {Manjit Sigh}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "266--281",
journal = "Educational Technology and Society",
issn = "1436-4522",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",
number = "3",

}

Engineering students learning preferences in UNITEN : Comparative study and patterns of learning styles. / Lee, Chen Kang; Basant Singh, Manjit Sigh.

In: Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 266-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engineering students learning preferences in UNITEN

T2 - Comparative study and patterns of learning styles

AU - Lee, Chen Kang

AU - Basant Singh, Manjit Sigh

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Engineering educators have been increasingly taking the learning style theories into serious consideration as part of their efforts to enhance the teaching and learning in engineering. This paper presents a research study to investigate the learning style preference of the mechanical engineering students in Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia by means of the Personality and Learning Styles instruments. Descriptive statistical method was used to analyze the collected samples (n = 122). The findings of this study revealed that the preference style for engineering students are more towards spontaneous, pragmatic and concrete style of learning. This is consistent with the previous research findings on the learning preference for engineering students in UNITEN using Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) and Felder and Silverman Index of Learning Style (ILS) instruments. Therefore, it is important for the engineering educators to be aware of the students learning preferences by adjusting the teaching and learning strategies to unleash the learning potential of the students. Multi-approaches in teaching and learning are recommended to accommodate different students learning preferences while widening the students learning capabilities in engineering education.

AB - Engineering educators have been increasingly taking the learning style theories into serious consideration as part of their efforts to enhance the teaching and learning in engineering. This paper presents a research study to investigate the learning style preference of the mechanical engineering students in Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia by means of the Personality and Learning Styles instruments. Descriptive statistical method was used to analyze the collected samples (n = 122). The findings of this study revealed that the preference style for engineering students are more towards spontaneous, pragmatic and concrete style of learning. This is consistent with the previous research findings on the learning preference for engineering students in UNITEN using Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) and Felder and Silverman Index of Learning Style (ILS) instruments. Therefore, it is important for the engineering educators to be aware of the students learning preferences by adjusting the teaching and learning strategies to unleash the learning potential of the students. Multi-approaches in teaching and learning are recommended to accommodate different students learning preferences while widening the students learning capabilities in engineering education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938086146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938086146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 266

EP - 281

JO - Educational Technology and Society

JF - Educational Technology and Society

SN - 1436-4522

IS - 3

ER -