Comparison of an Electromagnetic Energy Harvester Performance using Wound Coil Wire and PCB Coil

M. S.M. Resali, Hanim Salleh

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the performance of two types of electromagnetic energy harvester, one using manually wound coil wire (EH-EC) and the other one using printed circuit board (PCB) coil (EH-EP). The objective of the study is to measure the corresponding output voltage and power by varying the number of coils and the position of the magnet. The experiment was conducted at a fix 50 Hz of frequency and at 0.25g of acceleration. The EH-EP was found to be more effective than the 350 turns of the wound coil wire, with maximum power of 26 μW. Overall, the performance of the EH-EC showed better result with maximum power of 125 μW for 1050 turns when compared to the EH-EP.

Original languageEnglish
Article number012059
JournalIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Apr 2016
Event2nd International Conference on Advances in Renewable Energy and Technologies, ICARET 2016 - Putrajaya, Malaysia
Duration: 23 Feb 201625 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

energy
experiment
comparison

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{5919486a66664687b1d9685a156d5200,
title = "Comparison of an Electromagnetic Energy Harvester Performance using Wound Coil Wire and PCB Coil",
abstract = "This paper presents the performance of two types of electromagnetic energy harvester, one using manually wound coil wire (EH-EC) and the other one using printed circuit board (PCB) coil (EH-EP). The objective of the study is to measure the corresponding output voltage and power by varying the number of coils and the position of the magnet. The experiment was conducted at a fix 50 Hz of frequency and at 0.25g of acceleration. The EH-EP was found to be more effective than the 350 turns of the wound coil wire, with maximum power of 26 μW. Overall, the performance of the EH-EC showed better result with maximum power of 125 μW for 1050 turns when compared to the EH-EP.",
author = "Resali, {M. S.M.} and Hanim Salleh",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012059",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
journal = "IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science",
issn = "1755-1307",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Comparison of an Electromagnetic Energy Harvester Performance using Wound Coil Wire and PCB Coil. / Resali, M. S.M.; Salleh, Hanim.

In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, 012059, 19.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of an Electromagnetic Energy Harvester Performance using Wound Coil Wire and PCB Coil

AU - Resali, M. S.M.

AU - Salleh, Hanim

PY - 2016/4/19

Y1 - 2016/4/19

N2 - This paper presents the performance of two types of electromagnetic energy harvester, one using manually wound coil wire (EH-EC) and the other one using printed circuit board (PCB) coil (EH-EP). The objective of the study is to measure the corresponding output voltage and power by varying the number of coils and the position of the magnet. The experiment was conducted at a fix 50 Hz of frequency and at 0.25g of acceleration. The EH-EP was found to be more effective than the 350 turns of the wound coil wire, with maximum power of 26 μW. Overall, the performance of the EH-EC showed better result with maximum power of 125 μW for 1050 turns when compared to the EH-EP.

AB - This paper presents the performance of two types of electromagnetic energy harvester, one using manually wound coil wire (EH-EC) and the other one using printed circuit board (PCB) coil (EH-EP). The objective of the study is to measure the corresponding output voltage and power by varying the number of coils and the position of the magnet. The experiment was conducted at a fix 50 Hz of frequency and at 0.25g of acceleration. The EH-EP was found to be more effective than the 350 turns of the wound coil wire, with maximum power of 26 μW. Overall, the performance of the EH-EC showed better result with maximum power of 125 μW for 1050 turns when compared to the EH-EP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966667726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966667726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012059

DO - 10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012059

M3 - Conference article

VL - 32

JO - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

JF - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

SN - 1755-1307

IS - 1

M1 - 012059

ER -