Comparison between static and dynamic compaction for California Bearing Ratio (CBR)

M. Y. Doris Asmani, Mohamed Ahmed Hafez Ahmed, M. S. Shakri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is generally used to estimate the shear strength and stiffness modulus of subgrade in pavement design. Thus, a new laboratory compaction method has been created to obtain the CBR values based on OMC values by using Static Laboratory Compaction Method. Based on the laboratory results, it was found that the static compaction method is more practical and sensible than the dynamic compaction. Static compaction gives higher value in density of soil and CBR values. The static compaction onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.86 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 22.62%. Whereas, the dynamic compaction applied onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.74 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 20.14%. Furthermore, this method was created in order to close the gap between laboratory and field data in terms of developing further to improve engineering parameter especially for pavement design. According to the experimental results, the CBR values obtained from static compaction tests were higher than dynamic compaction method. In conclusion, this type of research is developed to improve engineering parameter, especially for road construction design and the higher CBR value can minimize the road design thickness and consequently reducing the cost of road construction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5857-5869
Number of pages13
JournalElectronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume18 Y
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Bearings (structural)
compaction
Compaction
road construction
Road construction
pavement
Soils
Pavements
engineering
comparison
subgrade
shear strength
stiffness
Shear strength
soil
method
road
Stiffness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

@article{53ecae5a089646d2a3918c50d438ed5c,
title = "Comparison between static and dynamic compaction for California Bearing Ratio (CBR)",
abstract = "California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is generally used to estimate the shear strength and stiffness modulus of subgrade in pavement design. Thus, a new laboratory compaction method has been created to obtain the CBR values based on OMC values by using Static Laboratory Compaction Method. Based on the laboratory results, it was found that the static compaction method is more practical and sensible than the dynamic compaction. Static compaction gives higher value in density of soil and CBR values. The static compaction onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.86 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 22.62{\%}. Whereas, the dynamic compaction applied onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.74 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 20.14{\%}. Furthermore, this method was created in order to close the gap between laboratory and field data in terms of developing further to improve engineering parameter especially for pavement design. According to the experimental results, the CBR values obtained from static compaction tests were higher than dynamic compaction method. In conclusion, this type of research is developed to improve engineering parameter, especially for road construction design and the higher CBR value can minimize the road design thickness and consequently reducing the cost of road construction.",
author = "{Doris Asmani}, {M. Y.} and {Hafez Ahmed}, {Mohamed Ahmed} and Shakri, {M. S.}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "18 Y",
pages = "5857--5869",
journal = "Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering",
issn = "1089-3032",
publisher = "Oklahoma State University",

}

Comparison between static and dynamic compaction for California Bearing Ratio (CBR). / Doris Asmani, M. Y.; Hafez Ahmed, Mohamed Ahmed; Shakri, M. S.

In: Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 18 Y, 2013, p. 5857-5869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between static and dynamic compaction for California Bearing Ratio (CBR)

AU - Doris Asmani, M. Y.

AU - Hafez Ahmed, Mohamed Ahmed

AU - Shakri, M. S.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is generally used to estimate the shear strength and stiffness modulus of subgrade in pavement design. Thus, a new laboratory compaction method has been created to obtain the CBR values based on OMC values by using Static Laboratory Compaction Method. Based on the laboratory results, it was found that the static compaction method is more practical and sensible than the dynamic compaction. Static compaction gives higher value in density of soil and CBR values. The static compaction onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.86 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 22.62%. Whereas, the dynamic compaction applied onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.74 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 20.14%. Furthermore, this method was created in order to close the gap between laboratory and field data in terms of developing further to improve engineering parameter especially for pavement design. According to the experimental results, the CBR values obtained from static compaction tests were higher than dynamic compaction method. In conclusion, this type of research is developed to improve engineering parameter, especially for road construction design and the higher CBR value can minimize the road design thickness and consequently reducing the cost of road construction.

AB - California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is generally used to estimate the shear strength and stiffness modulus of subgrade in pavement design. Thus, a new laboratory compaction method has been created to obtain the CBR values based on OMC values by using Static Laboratory Compaction Method. Based on the laboratory results, it was found that the static compaction method is more practical and sensible than the dynamic compaction. Static compaction gives higher value in density of soil and CBR values. The static compaction onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.86 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 22.62%. Whereas, the dynamic compaction applied onto Soil A specimen has given the value of MDD= 1.74 Mg/m3, and the CBR value was 20.14%. Furthermore, this method was created in order to close the gap between laboratory and field data in terms of developing further to improve engineering parameter especially for pavement design. According to the experimental results, the CBR values obtained from static compaction tests were higher than dynamic compaction method. In conclusion, this type of research is developed to improve engineering parameter, especially for road construction design and the higher CBR value can minimize the road design thickness and consequently reducing the cost of road construction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892154048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892154048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18 Y

SP - 5857

EP - 5869

JO - Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

JF - Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

SN - 1089-3032

ER -